Alcohol is marketed enthusiastically, easy to obtain, cheap, and existing laws are not consistently enforced. Combine these factors with a widespread belief that alcohol is a benign, fun, sexy and positively status-defining drug, and it becomes a pervasive force in culture; One that is very attractive to young people. High-risk alcohol use and alcohol abuse are complex problems that no strategy can solve, but higher MLDA is an effective approach. Europeans and Americans have radically different geography, transportation systems and policies, and socialization practices. For a variety of reasons, you can`t compare American and European teens when it comes to alcohol consumption and how they move. I would like to point out that if the legal drinking age were lowered to 18, it would encourage students to drink in local bars rather than at parties where alcohol consumption is completely unregulated. Most of these drink-related hospital visits take place when students drink at off-campus parties, not at local watering holes. As for the article, it seems convincing to me, but only as an argument that the current legal drinking age will not change, not that it should not change. The correlation with road deaths may be compelling enough to prevent changes in the law, but that`s not the purpose of setting the legal drinking age at 21, is it? As noted in various ways above, setting the drinking age would likely further reduce the number of victims, just as driving itself would make it illegal. Lowering the drinking age to 20 would make no difference. It must be at least 16 years old. BU Please give an unbiased view of the topic today.
Instead, use relevant statistics about the specific problem you`re addressing. This article discusses the relationship between deaths among 18- to 21-year-olds and the age of alcohol consumption. Do not drive under the influence of alcohol. In this regard, it is important to remember that there is no single threshold at which a person assumes all the rights and privileges of adulthood. The age chosen is usually 18, but not always: Under federal law, a person must be 21 to purchase a handgun from a state-licensed dealer, but not from a non-professional private seller. In Alabama, Alaska, New Jersey and Utah, a person cannot legally buy tobacco until the age of 19. Gambling laws vary wildly, with the legal age for different types of gambling ranging from 18 to 21. In each policy area, the age of declared majority is the result of careful consideration of benefits and risks. I have always been against a strict attitude towards the drinking age of 21. During my studies, I went to a college that was a dry campus.
Nearby was another college that allowed barrels in dormitories. An interesting comparison could be made between the two schools. This article is Bologna, I have been to Europe several times and found that a lower drinking age discourages excessive alcohol consumption. The United States has one of the highest rates of car accidents in the world, despite the high age of alcohol consumption. Some countries do not even have a minimum drinking age and manage to have much safer roads because children learn the pros and cons of drinking alcohol from an early age. Instead of cracking down on something teens would do anyway, we should teach them how to drink alcohol safely and responsibly. Not to mention that the United States could even be one step closer to a free country. Even communist North Korea has an alcohol drinking age of 18 (not that I approve of it).
But that could be wishful thinking, according to a study. Researchers at Boston University reviewed the scientific literature published since 2006 and concluded that maintaining the legal drinking age at 21 reduces rates of drunk driving and crashes, as well as underage drinking rates. Adults between the ages of 18 and 20 should not be denied this enjoyment if other enjoyable activities are legal by the age of 18. 100 of 102 analyses (98%) of a meta-study on the legal drinking age and traffic accidents found a higher legal drinking age, which is associated with lower rates of road accidents.  In the 30 years since the introduction of MLDA 21, drunk driving deaths have decreased by one-third.  The National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA) estimates that MLDA 21 saved 31,417 lives between 1975 and 2016.  Drinking and driving rates among teens have dropped 54 percent over the past two decades, and the largest declines were recorded between 1982 and 1995, a period that included changes to federal law urging all states to raise their drinking age to 21. But there is a very convincing argument for keeping the drinking age at 21: it saves lives. This may be hard to believe, considering the number of people who don`t follow the laws and drink anyway, but it has proven true time and time again in research. According to a meta-study on MLDA, 87% of studies found a higher legal drinking age, which is associated with lower alcohol consumption.  Studies show that when the drinking age is 21, those under 21 drink less and drink less in their early twenties, and adolescents who do not drink before the age of 21 tend to drink less in adulthood.  The number of 18- to 20-year-olds who drank alcohol in the past month increased from 59% in 1985 – one year after Congress passed the National Minimum Drinking Age Act – to 39% in 2016.
  Since I come from a STUDENT who actually witnesses these problems, I must disagree with you on this point. Of course, drunk driving deaths have decreased, but they are lower in all age groups and have decreased both in Canada (where the age is 18 or 19 years) and in the United States. Correlation is NOT a cause! We have become more aware of the dangers of drunk driving: cars are safer, seat belts and airbags are mandatory, paying higher prices for first-time offenders, etc. That`s what kept drunk drivers off the roads, not the legal age limit of 21. History says no. When U.S. states had a lower legal drinking age, the drinking problem was worse for minors.3 For example, before the legal drinking age of 21 was introduced by all states, underage drunk drivers were involved in more than twice as many fatal motor vehicle accidents as they are today.3 References 3. Has fallen, James. Excerpted from “Chapter 2: Federalism: Resolute, the Federal Government Should Restore the Freedom of Each State to Set Its Drinking Age. ” in Ellis, Richard and Nelson, Michael (eds.) Debating Reform.
CQPress Publishers, Fall 2009. New research shows that a minimum drinking age of 21 is associated with a lower rate of alcohol-related collisions among young adults, as well as a reduced risk of health problems associated with heavy drinking, including dating violence, unprotected sex and suicide. However, drinking age should only be one part of a wider range of measures that help reduce alcohol abuse and deaths. I also think that this is a very one-sided report, with statistics that may not be entirely objective. However, from the point of view of a student studying in Madrid (18 years old), I would like to say that the drinking culture here is very different. Parents usually introduce their children to a glass of wine at the age of 16 or pick them up from clubs at a certain time. This education and support does not encourage young people to drink more. In fact, every Spaniard I`ve met has said that it`s rare for people to drink to the point of vomiting.